POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, RULE OF LAW AND DEMOCRATIC VIGILANCE: ENHANCING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN NIGERIA’S DEMOCRATIC PROCESS
Published 2025-07-17
Keywords
- Political Communication,
- Rule of Law,
- Democratic Vigilance,
- Citizen Participation,
- Nigeria’s Democratic Process
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 American Journal of Arts and Communication

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study ascertained political communication, rule of law and democratic vigilance: enhancing citizen participation in Nigeria’s democratic process. The deliberative democracy theory was anchored in this study. This study adopted a qualitative research methodology anchored on email interviews. The research design was a descriptive exploratory design, suitable for capturing in-depth, context-rich narratives and individual perceptions. The population of the study comprises politically active Nigerian citizens, including civil society actors, legal practitioners, journalists and social media influencers, estimated at 5,000 individuals across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones, based on civil society engagement records and professional associations. These individuals were chosen due to their active involvement in political discourse and civic advocacy. From this population, a sample size of 30 respondents was selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured email interviews. The data were analysed using thematic content analysis, which involved coding responses, identifying recurring themes, and interpreting patterns in relation to the study variables. Findings revealed that political communication in Nigeria has the potential to influence citizen participation positively, especially, through social media and community engagement but its effectiveness is weakened by mistrust, elite control of narratives and widespread misinformation that often alienate and confuse the public rather than empower them. The study concluded that while political communication holds immense potential to mobilize Nigerian citizens and foster democratic participation, its effectiveness remains undermined by elite manipulation, lack of trust and the spread of misinformation revealing an urgent need for more transparent, inclusive, and citizen-centred communication strategies in the democratic process. The study recommended that The National Orientation Agency (NOA), in collaboration with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and media regulatory bodies such as the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission (NBC), develop and implement inclusive political communication frameworks that prioritise civic education, ethical political messaging, and media literacy. These institutions should also monitor and regulate political advertisements and campaign communications to reduce misinformation and promote issue-based engagement that encourages citizen participation
References
- African Union Commission. (2022). African governance report: promoting constitutionalism and the rule of law in Africa. African Union.
- Amnesty International. (2021). Nigeria: Crackdown on #EndSARS protesters continues. https://www.amnesty.org
- Arowolo, D. E., & Aluko, F. S. (2012). Democracy, political participation and good governance in Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 1(3), 797–809.
- Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (2000). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230.
- Carothers, T. (2006). Promoting the rule of law abroad: In search of knowledge. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.
- Dalton, R. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press.
- Freedom House. (2023). Freedom in the world 2023: Marking 50 years in the struggle for democracy. https://freedomhouse.org
- Gyimah-Boadi, E., & Logan, C. (2020). Vigilance and voice: Citizens’ views on democratic governance in Africa. Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 443.
- Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.
- McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication (6th ed.). Routledge.
- Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
- OECD. (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en
- Ojebuyi, B. R., & Salawu, A. (2020). Political communication in Africa: Identifying trends and research imperatives. Journal of African Media Studies, 12(2), 191–205.
- Okeke, V. O. (2021). The rule of law and democratic consolidation in Nigeria. African Journal of Law and Human Rights, 5(1), 87–101.
- Udeze, S., & Chukwuere, J. E. (2021). Social media and the spread of political misinformation in Nigeria: Implications for political participation. Journal of African Elections, 20(1), 76–93.
- United Nations. (2019). Report of the Secretary-General on the rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. United Nations.
- Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
- World Justice Project. (2023). Rule of law index 2023. https://worldjusticeproject.org
- Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
