Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021): May-June
Original Articles

IMPROVING LEARNING OUTCOMES: AN EXAMINATION OF INTEGRATED EDUCATION MANAGEMENT IN RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE

Maria Putriana Sari Pratiwi
Sebelas Maret University

Published 2023-09-15

Keywords

  • Education Inequality,
  • Integrated Schools,
  • 3T Regions,
  • Access to Education,
  • Education Policy

How to Cite

Pratiwi, M. P. S. (2023). IMPROVING LEARNING OUTCOMES: AN EXAMINATION OF INTEGRATED EDUCATION MANAGEMENT IN RIAU ISLANDS PROVINCE. International Journal of Political and Social Sciences, 6(3), 6–15. Retrieved from https://topjournals.org/index.php/IJPSS/article/view/434

Abstract

Education is a fundamental human right, enshrined in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights in Indonesia. Article 12 of this law emphasizes the right of every individual to personal development, education, self-improvement, and a better quality of life. Despite these legal provisions, the full realization of this right faces challenges in Indonesia, particularly in bridging the education quality gap between urban and rural areas, with a particular focus on the 3T regions (outermost, lagging, frontier).

This paper delves into the issue of education inequality and quality disparity in Indonesia, shedding light on the persistent gap between urban and rural education, which hampers the comprehensive implementation of the nine-year compulsory education program. The introduction of the nine-year compulsory education program aimed to ensure equitable access to education and enhance its overall quality. However, this goal remains unfulfilled, primarily due to geographical disparities, especially in remote border areas.

One critical initiative by the Indonesian government to address this challenge is the establishment of integrated schools, which offer both elementary and junior high school education within the same educational facility. This innovative approach seeks to minimize the barriers to education caused by the remote locations of schools in 3T regions. By consolidating educational services in a single accessible location, integrated schools aim to facilitate increased attendance and participation among students, ultimately striving to bridge the education gap between urban and rural areas.

This research explores the concept and implementation of integrated schools in Indonesia, examining their effectiveness in improving access to quality education and narrowing the educational divide. By analyzing the experiences and outcomes of integrated schools in 3T regions, this study seeks to provide insights into the broader implications for education policy and equity in the country

References

  1. A’ing, A. (2015). Study of the Development of Education in the Border Distric of Kayan Hulu, Malinau Regency. e-Journal Pemerintahan Integratif, 3, 545-559.
  2. Arikunto, S. (2013). Research Procedure: An Approach Practice. Jakarta : Asdi Mahasatya.
  3. Ariningsih, S. (2016). Development of the National Education at Middle School Model in thr Remote region, Disadvantaged, Outermost and Border as Citizenship Learning for Implementation. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 1, 76-86.
  4. Asri,S. (2017).Equality Policy and Quality Improvement of Education in Border Areas. JurnalPendidikandanPengajaran, 1,25-43.
  5. Febriana, M., Nurkamto, J., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Muhtia., A. (2018). Teaching in Rural Indonesian Schools: Teachers’ Challenges. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 5, 11-20.
  6. Hasan, R. (2013). Implementation of Integrated Elementary- Junior High School in Remote Areas by the Background of Central Borneo of Betang Houses (Multi Site Study at Integrated Junior High School of Mihing Raya 1, Integrated Junior High School of 2 Kurun, and Integrated Junior High School of 3 Tewah di Kabupaten Gunung Mas). Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19, 102- 119.
  7. Kalismaya, I. (2017). Comunity Education Aspirations in the Remore Areas of Bugelan Village, Kismantoro, Wonogiri. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 6, 248-262.
  8. Mayona, L. E.,Salahudin, &Kusmastuti, R. (2015).Directions Strategy and Development Priorities of The State Border Between in West Kalimantan Province. Jurnal Tata Loka, 13, 119-134.
  9. Moleong, J. L. (2005). Qualitative Research Methodology Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  10. Permatasari, A. (2014). Special Autonomy for Border Areas, Alternative Solutions fro Resolving Border Problems in Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21, 225-240.
  11. Posma, S.J.K.,Suzanna, J. L.T., Adolf, B.H., &Rutman.L. (2018).Normative Study on The Area/Space Structure Policy of State Border in Maluku Province. 3, 2018
  12. Putra, N., &Hendarman. (2012).Policy Research Methodology. Bandung: PT. RemajaRosdakarya.
  13. Sugiyono. (2008). Educational Reserach Methods: Quantitative, Qulaitative and R & D Approaches. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  14. Sukasni,A., & Efendy , H. (2017). The Problematic of Education System in Indonesia and Reform Agenda. International Journal of Education, 9, 183- 199.
  15. Sukmadinata, N. S. (2013). Educational Research Methods.Bandung: RemajaRosdakarya.
  16. Yosada, K. R. (2016). Education on the Frontline of Entikong Border Countries, Proceedings of the National Seminar: Strenghtening the Relationship between Youth Development, Education and Employment Development,1,192-201.