Vol. 9 No. 6 (2024): November-December
Original Articles

GUIDED SCORING INSTRUCTION AND MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ACROSS SCHOOL TYPES

Chinyere Ngozi Okoye
Department of Educational Psychology, School of Education, Federal College of Education, Eha-Amufu, Enugu, Nigeria.

Published 2024-12-12

Keywords

  • Guided scoring instructional strategy (GSIS), Achievement, Secondary school, School type, Mathematics

Abstract

The study investigated the effects of guided scoring instructional strategy (GSIS) on the achievement of secondary school students in mathematics: the school type perspective. Background: When the scoring pattern is guided, it is likely to result in uniformity of scoring of students’ work and involvement of students in their own assessment. GSIS may or may not have effect on the school type, since schools are usually either for female only, male only or mixed (coeducational). Aims: The study specifically sought to find out the effects of the GSIS on students based on school type. Methods: The design of the study was quasi-experimental, utilizing pre-test, post-test groups. A sample of 336 senior secondary class one students were chosen from a population of 3,111 from three (3) school types in Owerri municipal council, Imo State, Nigeria. The simple random sampling technique was used for selecting the experimental students while purposive sampling technique was used for selecting the 3 experimental schools. One research question and four hypotheses guided the study. Data obtained from pre-test and post-test were statistically analyzed using mean and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results: The results showed that there was difference in the effects of guided scoring instructional strategy (GSIS) on students in different school types with female school having the highest effect. Conclusion: School type is a factor in students’ achievement with GSIS. The strategy was recommended to be used in all school types to enhance secondary school teaching and learning outcomes.

References

  1. Adipere, E., Okpko, V., Leghemo, E. K., Enareigha, E. B., & Epem, U. (2021). Effect of guided diagram scoring teaching strategy on students’ achievement in Biology at senior secondary level. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science,5(11), 623 628. www.rsisinternational.org.
  2. Busari, D. A. (2016). Comparative evaluation of the academic performance of single sex and coeducation secondary school students in Ibadan, South West, Nigeria. African Journal for Psychological Study of Social Issues, 19(1). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajpssi/.
  3. Hussain, S. (2020). A comparison of students’ academic achievement in English in single sex and co-educational schools. Review of Economic and Development Studies,6(2). https://reads.spcrd.org/index.php/reads.
  4. Maberia, N., & Mokgosi, P.N. (2021). Factors contributing to poor learners’ performance in Mathematics: Case of selected schools in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Problem of Education in 21st Century, 79(3), 451-466.
  5. Ullah, R., and Ullah, H. (2019). Boys versus girls’ educational performance: empirical evidences from global north and global south. African Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 163-167. doi:10.30918/AFRJ.74.19.036.
  6. Okafor, E. O., & Mokwelu, B.O.(2018).Influence of co-education on academic performance of secondary school students in Anambra State Nigeria. Hofa: African Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 68-76.
  7. Osuala, R. C., Ihediohanma, A. C., & Urenyere, R. U. (2018). Effects of guided scoring instructional strategy on the achievement of secondary school students in Mathematics: the gender perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Gender and Women Development Studies, 1(3), 81-90.
  8. Pendleton, M. (2016). A comparison of single gender and co-educational classroom students’ engagement and achievement scores (Doctoral dissertation, Lindenwood University).
  9. Yalcinkaya, M. T., & Ulu, A. (2012). Difference between single sex school and co-educational school. Procedia-social and Behavioural Sciences, 46, 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspio.2012.05.058.