Vol. 9 No. 4 (2024): July-August
Articles

IMPROVING ELECTRIC POWER AVAILABILITY IN POULTRY FARMS USING INTELLIGENT STANDALONE HYBRID RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM

Ogbu, Mary Nnenna C
Department of Computer Engineering, Caritas University, Amorji – Nike, Enugu, Nigeria
Okolotu G.I
Department Of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering, Delta State University Of Science And Technology, P.M.B. 05, Ozoro, Nigeria.

Published 2024-07-08

Keywords

  • Electric Power, Availability, Poultry Farm, Intelligent Standalone Fuzzy Inference System, Hybrid, Renewable Energy System

How to Cite

Ogbu, M. N. C., & Okolotu , G. (2024). IMPROVING ELECTRIC POWER AVAILABILITY IN POULTRY FARMS USING INTELLIGENT STANDALONE HYBRID RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM. Top Academic Journal of Engineering and Mathematics, 9(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12685017

Abstract

The decrease in the production capacity of some poultries and sudden death of the birds in these poultries are as a result of not having ideal power that will make some of these poultries to function efficiently. This was overcome by introducing improved electric power availability in the poultry farmat Amoli community in Enugu State for an increased output using intelligent standalone hybrid renewable energy system. This was done by characterizing the availability of electric power in poultry farm, establishing the causes of power unavailability in poultry farm in AMOLI community in Enugu State that triggered the low production capacity, determining available sources of renewable energy that will boost electric power availability in poultry farm at AMOLI community and subsequently improved its production capacity. The study designed a standalone rulebase that improves the availability of the electric power in poultry farm thereby enhancing its production capacity. A Simulink model used for improving the availability of electric power in poultry farm was designed. The percentage improvement of the availability of electric power and its production capacity in poultry farm at AMOLI community in Enugu State were validated and justified. The result obtained with the conventional electric power availability in poultry farm was 70KW that caused low production in the poultry. This was because conventional electric power could not meet the threshold of 72 through 75KW. On the other hand, when standalone was integrated in the system it becomes73.78KW thereby improving the production capacity of the poultry and the number of chickens hatched in poultry farm at the community was 1000 with the conventional while when standalone was integrated in the system hatched chickens were 1054. With these results the percentage improvement in the production capacity of the poultry was5.4%

References

  1. FAO. (2024). Gateway to poultry production and products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
  2. Nations. P 2. http://www.fao.org/poultry-production-products/production/poultry-species/en
  3. Okolotu G. I., Akpenyi–Aboh O. N., Okareme F., Emumejaye E. P., Nwanze N.E., Apke A. S., &
  4. Ewhrudjakpor C. E. (2024). Engineering of the Battery Cage for Poultry Production. European Journal
  5. of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 8(1), p 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10891090
  6. Okolotu, G. I., Oluka, S. I., & Eje, B. E. (2018). Instrumentation of the rain gauge for rainfall measurement.
  7. American Journal of Engineering Research, 7(10), p 1. http://www.ajer.org
  8. Okolotu G.I., Oluka S.I., Eze P.C., 2017. Determination Of Erosivity Of Enugu State. International Journal Of
  9. Environment, Agriculture And Biotechnology. 2(1). P 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/2.1.11
  10. Sefat M., Borgaee A., Beheshti B. &Bakhoda H., (2014) “Modelling Energy Efficiency in Broiler Chicken
  11. Production Units Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)”. International Journal of Natural and
  12. Engineering Sciences, 8 (1), pp. 07-14.
  13. Nguyen, T.T.H., Bouvarel, I., Ponchant, P., Hayo, M.G. & Werf, V.D., 2012. “Using Environmental
  14. Constraints to Formulate Low-impact Poultry Feeds.Journal of Cleaner Production, 28, 215-224,
  15. Salazar M. Cruz. R. &Rojano P., 2012. Energy efficiency in Mexican greenhouses, In Spanish. Revista
  16. Mexicana de CienciasAgrícolas, 4(6), pp. 736-742.
  17. Roy, P., Orikasa, T., Thammawong, M., Nakamura, N., Xu, Q., & Shiina,T., 2011. Life cycle of meats: an
  18. opportunity to abate the greenhouse gas emission from meat industry in Japan. Journal of environmental
  19. management, 93(1), 218-24.
  20. INEGEI 1990 - 2010, 2010. Quinta Comunicación Nacional ante laCMNUCC, National Institute of Ecology (In
  21. Spanish), México
  22. Oviedo-Rondon E., 2009. Ahorroenergéticoengranjasavícolas,(Energysavings in poultry farms, in Spanish)
  23. Proc. of the XLVII SymposiumCientífico de Avicultura, Zaragoza.
  24. Estudio Integral de Sistemas de Bombeo de Agua Potable Municipal (Potable Water Municipal Water Pumping
  25. Systems, In Spanish); CONUUE, SENER, Cooperación Alemana al Desarrollo, México, D.F.
  26. Cederberg, C., Flysjö, A., Sonesson, U., Sund, & V., Davis, J., 2009. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Swedish
  27. Consumption of Meat, Milk and Eggs 1990 and 2005. SIK Report 793. The Swedish Institute for Food
  28. and Biotechnology.
  29. Pelletier, N., 2008. “Environmental Performance in the US Broiler Poultry Sector: Life Cycle Energy Use and
  30. Greenhouse Gas, Ozone Depleting, Acidifying and Atrophying Emissions”. Agricultural Systems, 98(2),
  31. pp. 67-73