Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): January-Febuary
Original Articles

A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO RAILWAY LANDSLIDE RISK ASSESSMENT USING HIERARCHICAL GREY RELATION ANALYSIS

He, Xiao-Rong
Baoji Electric Service Section of Xi'an Railway Bureau, Baoji, 721000, China
Ji, Yu-Tong
Baojidong Railway Station of Xi'an Railway Bureau, Baoji, 721000, China

Published 2023-09-20

Keywords

  • Landslide risk assessment,
  • Evaluation factors,,
  • Factor selection,
  • Data analysis,
  • Random Forest model

How to Cite

He, X.-R., & Ji, Y.-T. (2023). A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO RAILWAY LANDSLIDE RISK ASSESSMENT USING HIERARCHICAL GREY RELATION ANALYSIS. Academic Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 1–14. Retrieved from https://topjournals.org/index.php/AJSET/article/view/591

Abstract

The West Sichuan Railway in China traverses challenging terrain characterized by steep slopes and a high seismic activity, leading to the frequent occurrence of landslides and other geological disasters during both construction and operation. Landslides pose a substantial threat to passenger safety and railway infrastructure. In the Chengdu Baiyu section alone, 126 landslides have been recorded, emphasizing the urgency of landslide risk assessment and prevention [1]. Landslide risk refers to the likelihood of slope failures evolving into various forms of disasters under the influence of multiple factors [3]. This study focuses on enhancing landslide risk assessment by optimizing the selection of evaluation factors. Previous research has explored various methods for factor selection and evaluation models in landslide risk assessment. One approach employed rough set analysis, correlation analysis, and principal component analysis to identify landslide evaluation factors, subsequently utilizing support vector machine models for landslide susceptibility evaluation [4]. This method demonstrated improvements in evaluation accuracy by reducing and refining evaluation factors. Another study applied the Apriori algorithm for correlation analysis of landslide evaluation factors and employed the Random Forest model for landslide susceptibility evaluation, resulting in more accurate evaluation results closely aligned with actual landslide distribution [5]. Additionally, genetic algorithms and rough set analysis were employed to screen landslide evaluation factors, coupled with BP neural networks for landslide susceptibility evaluation, revealing higher evaluation model accuracy with reduced factors [6]. Models like BP neural networks, support vector machines, Logistic regression, and Random Forest have consistently shown strong performance in landslide susceptibility assessment [7][8][9][10]. In a comparative study, the Random Forest model outperformed Logistic regression, Multilayer perceptron, and gradient enhancement tree models in landslide risk assessment [11]. However, a gap exists in the selection of evaluation factors as some studies have neglected to consider the contribution of these factors to landslide events, potentially compromising calculation efficiency and evaluation accuracy. Furthermore, the conventional data analysis method for factor screening often involves calculating the contribution rate of factors, which may introduce errors and outliers into the evaluation factor data extracted from landslide events. This could lead to the inadvertent elimination of important factors during data calculation and analysis, ultimately affecting the accuracy of evaluation results. Therefore, this study seeks to address these limitations by proposing a novel approach to evaluate landslide risk that incorporates a comprehensive consideration of evaluation factors and employs advanced data analysis techniques.

References

  1. Lu CF, Cai CX, 2019. Challenges and Countermeasures for Construction Safety during the Sichuan–Tibet Railway Project. Engineering, 5(05):49-61. DOI: CNKI:SUN:GOCH. 0. 2019-05-010. [2] Li XZ, Cui Y, Zhang XG, et al., 2019. Characteristics and spatial distribution law of landslides and collapses along Sichuan-Tibet railway. Journal of Engineering Geology, 27(S): 110-120. DOI:10. 26914/c. cnkihy. 2019. 014704.
  2. Wang Ting, 2020. Landslide Risk Assessment Based on Combined Analysis of Weight Method and Simulation Method: A Case Study of Parts of Wanyuan City. DOI: 10. 26986/d. cnki. gcdlc. 2020. 000805.
  3. Yu XY, Hu YJ, Niu RQ, 2016. Research on the Method to Select Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Factors Based on RS-SVM Model. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 32(03): 23-28+2. Doi: CNKI: SUN: DLGT. 0. 2016-03-005.
  4. Liu R, Li LY, Yang X, et al., 2021, Landslide Susceptibility Mappping Based on Factor Strong Correlation Analysis Method[J]. Earth and Environment, 49(02):198-206. Doi: 10. 14050/j. cnki. 1672-9250. 2020. 48. 108.
  5. Tang RX, Yan EC, Tang W, 2017. Landslide susceptibility evaluation based on rough set and back-propagation neural network [J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 45(06):129-138.
  6. Aditian A, Kubota T, Shinohara Y, 2018. Comparison of GIS-based landslide susceptibility models using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network in a tertiary region of Ambon, Indonesia. Geomorphology, 318:101-111. DOI:10. 1016/j. geomorph. 2018. 06. 006.
  7. Huang Y, Zhao L. 2018. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines. Catena, 165: 520−529. DOI:10. 1016/j. catena. 2018. 03. 003.
  8. Luigi L, Martin M P. 2018. Presenting logistic regression-based landslide susceptibility results. Engineering Geology, 244: 14−24. DOI:10. 1016/j. enggeo. 2018. 07. 019.
  9. Wu XQ, Lai CG, Chen XH, et al. A landslide hazard assessment based on random forest weight:a case study in the Dongjiang River Basin, Journal of Natural Disasters, 2017, 26(05): 119-129. DOI: 10. 13577/j. jnd. 2017. 0514.
  10. Ahmed N, Firoze A, Rahman RM. 2020. Machine learning for predicting landslide risk of Rohingya refugee camp infrastructure. Journal of Information and Telecommunication, 4(2): 175-198. DOI: 10. 1080/ 24751839. 2019. 1704114.
  11. Wang JH, Jin HL, Ni TX, et al., 2017. The application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process in risk assessment of debris flow gully in Kangle County. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 28(03):52-57. DOI: 10. 16031/j. cnki. issn. 1003- 8035. 2017. 03. 08.
  12. Huang F, Wang Y, Dong Zhiliang, et al., 2019. Regional Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Grey Relational Degree Model. Earth Science, 44(02):664-676.
  13. Jaiswal P, Van. W C J, Jetten V. Quantitative assessment of direct and indirect landslide risk along transportation lines in southern India[J]. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 2010, 10(6):1253-1267.DOI:10.5194/nhess-10-1253-2010.
  14. Zhang C, Wang Q, Chen JP, et al., 2011. Evaluation of debris flow risk in Jinsha River based on combined weight process. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 32(03):831-836. DOI: 10. 162 85/ j. rsm. 2011. 03. 019.
  15. Tan GS, Cao SX, Zhao B, et al., 2020. An assessment of power transformers based on association rules and variable weight coefficients. Power System Protection and Control, 48(01): 88-95. DOI: 10. 19783/j. cnki. pspc. 190072.
  16. Song RJ, Liu RY, Liu YW, et al., 2018. Key Indicator System Establishment and Application for Transformer Condition Assessment Based on Hierarchy Grey Relation Analysis. High Voltage Engineering, 44(08):2509-2515. DOI: 10. 133 36/j. 1003-6520. hve. 20180731010.
  17. Zhang WQ, Luo GP, Zheng HW, et al., 2020. Analysis of vegetation index changes and driving forces in inland arid areas based on random forest model: a case study of the middle part of northern slope of the north Tianshan Mountains. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44(11): 1113-1126.
  18. Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32. DOI: 10. 1023/A: 1010933404324.
  19. Yang ZJ, Ding PP, Wang D, et al., 2018. Landslide Risk Analysis on et a Sichuan-Tibet Railway (Kangding to Nyingchi Section) Journal of the China Railway Society, 40(09): 97-103. DOI: CNKI: SUN: TDXB. 0. 2018-09-015.
  20. Wang WD, Fu QX, Tang R. 2018. Landslide spatiotemporal susceptibility analysis of Chengdu-Yaan section in Sichuan-Tibet railway. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 15(04): 862-870. DOI:10. 19713/j. cnki. 43-1423/u. 2018. 04. 006.
  21. Reichenbach P, Rossi M, Malamud B D, et al. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models [J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 180, 60-91