Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): July-August
Original Articles

CRYONICS SUSPENSION AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION: REIMAGINING CONTINUITY AND CONSCIOUSNESS IN HUMANITY'S FUTURE

Eke, Chigozi (PhD)
Department of Linguistics and Communication Studies, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.

Published 2025-08-07

Keywords

  • Cryonics Suspension,
  • Digital Communication,
  • Reimagining Continuity,
  • Consciousness,
  • Humanity's Future

How to Cite

Eke, C. (2025). CRYONICS SUSPENSION AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION: REIMAGINING CONTINUITY AND CONSCIOUSNESS IN HUMANITY’S FUTURE. Academic Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 10(3), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17176054

Abstract

This research examined cryonics suspension and digital communication: reimagining continuity and consciousness in humanity's future. Media Technological Determinism and Cybernetic Ontology theories formed the anchor for this research. This study adopted a phenomenological research methodology to explore how individuals conceptualize and experience the intersection of cryonics suspension and digital communication as pathways to posthumous continuity and consciousness. The target population consists of approximately 150 individuals globally, including cryonics practitioners, trans-humanist thinkers, digital legacy developers, neuroethicists and AI technologists, who are directly engaged with or have scholarly or professional insights into human identity preservation technologies. These individuals are drawn from institutions such as the Alcor Life Extension Foundation, KrioRus, academic research centres and digital innovation labs in countries like the United States, Russia, Germany, South Africa and Nigeria. A purposive sample of 20 participants were selected using expert sampling and data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted virtually via video conferencing platforms. The data were analysed using thematic analysis, following Moustakas’ phenomenological reduction steps, including horizonalization, clustering of themes, and synthesis of meanings to reveal core essences shared across participant narratives. The study found out that, while cryonics suspension techniques like vitrification can preserve the structural integrity of brain tissue, there is no current scientific evidence confirming the restoration of consciousness or cognitive function after suspension, leaving the promise of continuity through cryonics largely theoretical and technologically aspirational. The research concluded that, while cryonics shows potential for preserving the brain’s structural components, the lack of verifiable revival outcomes and unresolved scientific uncertainties about the restoration of consciousness highlight the need for further empirical research before it can be considered a reliable method of human continuity. The research recommended that, scientific research institutions such as the Alcor Life Extension Foundation, Cryonics Institute and global neuroscience laboratories invest in advanced, long-term studies on brain connectome preservation and revival to validate the functional outcomes of cryonics suspension.

References

  1. Alcor Life Extension Foundation. (2024). Alcor FAQ. https://www.alcor.org/
  2. Best, B. (2018). Scientific justification for cryonics practice. Cryonics Institute.
  3. Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2022). Digital afterlives: Death, identity and social media. SAGE Publications.
  4. Dehaene, S. (2020). Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. Penguin Random House.
  5. Emanuel, R., Strout, J., & Khan, S. (2021). Neural mapping and the future of memory preservation. Neuroethics Journal, 14(2), 115–129.
  6. Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.
  7. Gorman, M. (2022). Legal and ethical challenges in cryonic preservation: An Australian perspective. Bioethics Quarterly, 38(3), 221–237.
  8. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
  9. HereAfter AI. (2023). Digital legacy platform overview. https://www.hereafter.ai/
  10. Kaku, M. (2021). The God equation: The quest for a theory of everything. Doubleday.
  11. Koch, C. (2022). The feeling of life itself: Why consciousness is widespread but can't be computed. MIT Press.
  12. McIntyre, R. L., & Fahy, G. M. (2015). Brain preservation and the connectome. Cryobiology, 71(1), 1–9.
  13. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
  14. More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. Wiley-Blackwell.
  15. Musk, E. (2023). Neuralink and the future of brain-computer interfaces. Neuralink Presentation, December 2023.
  16. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2023). Neurotechnologies and human enhancement: Ethical perspectives. Nuffield Reports.
  17. Obot, E. A. (2023). Transhumanist discourses in African tech ecosystems: Cryonics and the ethics of digital immortality. Journal of African Technological Futures, 9(1), 54–69.
  18. Peters, J. D. (2015). The marvellous clouds: Toward a philosophy of elemental media. University of Chicago Press.
  19. Pratt, H., Ellis, J., & Mohr, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence and neural simulation: Toward post-biological identities. Technoscience and Society, 7(4), 348–366.
  20. Roden, D. (2015). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. Routledge.
  21. Sandberg, A., & Bostrom, N. (2020). Whole brain emulation: A roadmap. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 30(1), 1–32.
  22. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press