##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
Academic Journal of Legal Studies and Research
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): January-Febuary
Original Articles

BEHIND BARS AND BEYOND BORDERS: UNRAVELING THE NEXUS OF SENTENCING AND DEPORTATION IN NIGERIA

Download
  • Adewale Olumide Akindele
Adewale Olumide Akindele
Faculty of Law, University of Lagos, Nigeria.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10589042

Published 2024-01-30

Keywords

  • Sentencing,
  • Deportation,
  • Criminal Justice,
  • Immigration Policies,
  • Legal Nexus

How to Cite

Akindele , A. O. (2024). BEHIND BARS AND BEYOND BORDERS: UNRAVELING THE NEXUS OF SENTENCING AND DEPORTATION IN NIGERIA. Academic Journal of Legal Studies and Research, 9(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10589042

Copyright (c) 2024 Academic Journal of Legal Studies and Research

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The intricate intersection of sentencing and deportation within the Nigerian legal framework presents a multifaceted panorama of challenges and considerations. This paper embarks on a comprehensive exploration of this dynamic interplay, shedding light on the legal analysis of Section 316 (5) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law in Lagos State, Nigeria. Delving into the complexities of this nexus, the study navigates the landscape from the courtroom to the border, unraveling the nuances that define the relationship between sentencing decisions and subsequent deportation actions. The legal foundation for this investigation is Section 316 (5) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law, Lagos State, a pivotal legislative provision that underscores the juncture of criminal justice administration and immigration policies. The paper contextualizes the Nigerian legal landscape, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of how sentencing determinations can catalyze deportation proceedings. Initiating the discourse, the introduction highlights the growing significance of addressing the intricacies of sentencing and deportation within the Nigerian legal milieu. It underscores the consequential impact of judicial decisions on individuals' lives, extending beyond the confines of the courtroom to influence their status and rights beyond national borders. As Nigeria grapples with the challenges of maintaining a delicate balance between justice and national security, the paper seeks to demystify the legal intricacies surrounding the interconnection of sentencing and deportation. Drawing attention to the potential consequences of criminal convictions on immigration status, it unveils the legal underpinnings that shape the trajectory of individuals behind bars and their fate beyond the nation's borders. This study not only delves into the legal provisions governing the interplay of sentencing and deportation but also contemplates the ethical dimensions and societal implications of such legal decisions. It scrutinizes the potential for inequality and injustice that may arise from a lack of clarity in navigating this intricate legal nexus, calling for a nuanced and rights-centric approach to ensure the equitable treatment of individuals entangled in the web of sentencing and deportation.

Download

References

  1. The Bible, Deuteronomy, Chapter 19, verse 21 (new International Version) Great Britain: Colorado Springs. Co. P.140. Leviticus, chapter 24, verses 17-24 states that “when one man strikes another and kills him, he shall be put to death. Whoever strikes a heart and kills it shall make restitution, life for life. When one man injures and disfigures his fellow – countrymen, it shall be done to him as he has done, facture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for toot; the injury and disfigurement that he has inflicted upon another shall in turn be inflicted upon him.
  2. Dambazau, A.B. 92006), Criminology and Criminal Justice, Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited, p.303
  3. (2007) 18 NWLR (pt. 1066) 240 at pp.298-299, paras H-D. See also, Abu v State (1976) 5 S.C. 21: Alemi v A.G. Lagos State & Anor (1996) 6 NWLR (Pt. 452) p.429: Ada v State (2008) All. FWLR (pt. 427) p.1 and Olaiya v State (2008) All FWLR (pt. 438) p. 372
  4. Ukattah, F.I.E (1992) Sentencing and Probation” Op.cit
  5. Ayua, I.A. (1983) “Towards a more Appropriate Sentencing Policy in Nigeria” Ahmadu Bello University Law Journal, p.1.
  6. Omole Soji (1984) “Application of the Theories Behind Criminal Punishment” The Advocate (Special Edition), Vol. 8, p.64
  7. Isabella, O. (1996) “The Death Penalty as an Effective Deterrence to Drug Abuse and Trafficking: Myth or Reality”
  8. Publication of the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, p.15
  9. Decree No. 20 of 1984. Under the Decree, Lawal Ojulope, Bernard Ogedegbe and BathlomewOwoh were executed in 1985 37Dembazau, A.B. Op.cit at p.308
  10. Keith Devline (1970) Sentencing Offenders in Magistrate’s Court.London: Sweet and Maxwell, p.10
  11. Section 17 of the Children and Young Persons Act, Cap. 80 Laws of the Federation, 2004 makes provisions for the imposition of probation and parole on Juveniles.
  12. Adeyemi, A.A. (2007) “The Problem of Imprisonment in the Nigerian Penal System” in Popoola, A. O. And Adodo, E.O.I
  13. (eds.) Current Legal Development in Nigeria – Essays in Memory of Professor J.D. Ojo. Ile-Ife, O.A.U. Press at p.70
  14. Garner, B.A. (ed.) Black’s Law Dictionary, Op.cit. at p.504. See also, section 439, Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015
  15. These offences are created in sections 56-60 of the Immigration Act, 2015. The 2015 Act created more offences than the Immigration Act of 1963
  16. The Act uses the term “prohibited immigration” while the 1963 Immigration Act used “inadmissible immigrant” 45Section 44 of the Immigration Act, 2015
  17. Onuoha, F. (2009) “Corruption and National Security: The Three-gap Theory and the Nigerian Experience”Nigerian Journal of Economic and Financial Crimes, 2:1-13; Trafficking in Persons (Prohibited Law) Enforcement and Administration Act, 2003. The Act, created the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons and other Related Matters (NAPTIP). See also, Article 5, Protocol to prevent Trafficking of Persons which came into force on 25th December, 2003 pursuant to the United Nations Convention Against TransanationalOrganised Crime. The Protocol is designed to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children
  18. For instance, Article 2(1-7) of the Extradition Treaty between the Government of Nigeria and the Government of South Africa (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap. E26, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 states that extraditable offences are offences punishable under the laws of both countries or consist of attempting to commit aiding, abetting, inducing, counselling or procuring the commission or being an accessory before or after the fact of the said offences or a person sought for an offence against a law relating to taxation, customs duties, exchange control or other revenue matters. 48Section 20 of the Immigration Act empowers the Comptroller- General of Immigration to issue visa. Application for visa can also be made to the appropriate Nigerian Diplomatic Mission established abroad. The Comptroller-general of Immigration has power to issue Tourist visas, Direct transit Visas. See also, Masajuwa, F. et.al (2018) “Illegal Transnational
  19. Immigration: Implication for Human Rights and Dignity of Nigerians” Being the institutional paper presented by Faculty of Law, Edo University, Iyamibo at the 51st Conference of the Nigerian Association of Law Teachers held on July1-6, 2018 at the Nigerian Law School, Abuja.
  20. Omorodion, F.I. (2009) “Vulnerability of Nigerian Secondary School to Human Sex Trafficking in Nigeria” African Journal of Reproductive Health, 13(2), p.33
  21. Section 45(2) of the Immigration Act. The Federal Government approved the deportation of 10 Egyptians and 7 Sri-Lankas with immediate effect. The Minister of Interior signed the deportation pursuant to sections 45(2), 46(1) and 47(1) of the Immigration Act, 2015. The said 10 Egyptians violated the conditions for their entry. The 7 Sri-Lankas that were jailed for petroleum product related offences after serving their jail terms were ordered by the court to be deported to their country. The Minister also signed the deportation order of one Ali Mahamal- Taher to France and one Kasinathan Ramasamy to India for involving in activities violating the condition of their entry into Nigeria.
  22. (1962) L.L.R. 177; See also, Nwambe v State (1995) 3 NWLR (pt 384) p.385
  23. Garner, B.A. (ed.) Black’s Law Dictionary, Op.citat p. 504. See also, section 439, Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 Section 440, Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015
  24. Section 26(1) of the Chiefs Law of Oyo State, 1978 and section 17 of the Chiefs Law, Cap 5, Laws of Ekiti State, 2010, see also Adebayo, A.M. (2013) Practical Approach to Chieftaincy Matters in Nigeria. Lagos: Princeton Publishing Co. p.141 66Section 18 of the Chiefs Law of Ekiti State, 2010
  25. (1982) 3 NCLR, p. 349. See also, Kusamotu, G (2001) Chieftaincy and the Law, Ibadan: Sulek-Temik Publishing Company, p.89.
  26. Section 1(1) and (3) of the Constitution of Nigeria, 1999 as amended. See also, Momoh v Fache (2007) 42 WRN, p.131 at 144, Lines 25-30; Federal Capital Development Authority v John Ezinkwo (2007) 18 WRN, 158 at 178, Lines 15-25 and Awefeada, U.V.
  27. (2006) Nigerian Legislature “Between the Law and Money Making Powers”Ekiti State University Law Journal, 7:118
  28. Akande, J.O. (2000) Introduction to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999. Lagos: MIJ Professional Publishers Limited, p.78. See also, Odogar v A.G. of the Federation (1996) 6 NWLR (pt 456), p 508 71(1981) 2 NCLR, p. 459
  29. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 replaced the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,
  30. . In Tony Momoh v Senate of the National Assembly (1981) 1 N.C.L.R, p.21, the provisions of section 31 of the Legislative (Powers and Privileges) Act, cap.102, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria and Lagos, 1958, which provides that court’s process cannot be served within the chambers or precincts of a legislative house while the house is sitting was held inconsistent with the provisions of section 42 of the 1979 Constitution by virtue of section 1 of the Constitution which proclaims the supremacy of the Constitution.
  31. He was deposed pursuant to section 13 of the Kano State Emirate Council Law, 2019.which empowers the Government to depose an emir only after due inquiry and in consultation with State Council of Chiefs.
  32. Monday Ubani “Removal and Banishment of Sanusi Lamido Sanusi is Illegal” https://thenigerianlawyer.com/theremovaland-banishment-of-sanusi-lamidi-sanusi-is-illegal, accessed on 17/03/2020; Femi Falana “Falana, SAN asks Kano Govt to Release Sanusi and Allow him To Enjoy His Fundamental Rights to Personal Liberty” https://thenigerianlawyer.com accessed on 17/03/2020
  33. Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/357/2020. See also, Gbenga Adeniyi et al. (2020) “12 SANS lead Sanusi’s Freedom Battle” The Punch, Friday, March 13, p.2
  34. Lamido Sanusi, being the Chairman of the Emirates Council would have known if such meeting was summoned. See also,
  35. Mike Osekhome (2020) “Illegality of Sanusi’s Dethronement, Banishment” The Guardian, Thursday, March 17, p.43
  36. (1950) 12 W.A.C.A, p.406. See also, the Queen v the Administrator, Western Nigeria and Anor (1962) W.R.N.L.R, p. 313 at 316
  37. Adewale, M.A. (2020) “The Legality of the Dethronement and Banishment of Traditional Rulers in Nigeria: Sanusi Lamido
  38. Sanusi as a case study” https://thenigrianlawyer.com accessed on 17/03/2020
  39. Oluyede, P.A. (2007) Nigerian Administrative Law, Ibadan: University Press PLC, 251
  40. Chukwudi, A. (2009) “Lagos State Deports 129 Beggars” Daily Sun, April 10:3
  41. Kolawole Adeyemi (2020) “Kano Sends Home 1.595 Almajiris” The Nation, Tuesday, 21st April, p.3
  42. Funke Egbemde “Why we are deporting Illegal Miners” https://thenigerianlawyer.com, accessed on 8th May, 2020. The Special Adviser to the Zamfara State Governor on Public Enlightenment, Media and Communication, ZaibaniBappa accused the Osun State Government of acting in bad taste.
  43. the deposed Emir of Kano was allegedly subjected to maximum trauma. He was on the road for seven hours, arrived Nasarawa State around 2.a.m. See EniolaAkinkuotuet al. (2020) “Sanusi to Challenge Detention, Forced Exile” The Punch Wednesday, March 11, p.2
  44. Sagay, I.E. (1998) The Work of the Supreme Court (1980-1988). Lagos: Nigerian Law Publications Limited p.277 at 278 96Afenifere is the Pan Yoruba Cultural Group, Arewa Consultative Forum is for the Hausa/Fulani and Ohaneze Ndigbo is for the Ibos. All the members of these groups maintain loyalty to their various groups at the expense of Nigeria.