EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF THE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS PROTECTION ACT ON DOMESTIC MINOR SEX TRAFFICKING
Published 2023-09-21
Keywords
- Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA),,
- sex trafficking,
- child sex trafficking,
- criminalization,
- prostitution laws.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Academic Journal of Legal Studies and Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) revolutionized the fight against human trafficking, particularly in the context of sex trafficking. However, while it provided essential services and safeguards for foreign victims, its impact on American trafficking victims remained limited. Subsequent reauthorizations in 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2013 aimed to address this gap by focusing on U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPR) who fell victim to sex trafficking. These legislative changes sought to eliminate disparities between legal and illegal citizens when it came to sex trafficking within the United States. Sex trafficked minors, who endure physical and psychological suffering, including health issues, violence, substance misuse, and academic setbacks, benefited from these legislative improvements. Many of them are also at risk of contracting serious diseases. However, despite these advancements, there is still a critical issue to address: the potential criminalization of child sex trafficking victims in states that enforce prostitution laws for minors involved in illegal sex work. The TVPA's language sometimes lacks clarity, particularly in defining sex trafficking. It primarily addresses "severe forms of trafficking in persons," encompassing sex trafficking induced by force, fraud, or coercion, especially when the victim is under 18 years of age. While the TVPA has made significant strides in combatting sex trafficking, further research is needed to understand its effectiveness in preventing the criminalization of child sex trafficking victims, particularly in states with conflicting prostitution laws
References
- Bergman, A. L. (2012). For their own good? Exploring legislative responses to the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the Illinois safe children act. Vanderbilt Law Review,65(5), 1361-1400.
- Clawson, H. J., & Goldblatt Grace, L. (2007). Finding a path to recovery: Residential facilities for minor victims of domestic sex trafficking. Human trafficking: Data and documents (Vol. 10). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- Crile, S. (2012). A minor conflict: why the objectives of federal sex trafficking legislation preempt the enforcement of state prostitution laws against minors. American University Law Review,61(6), 1783-1824.
- Finklea, K., Fernandes-Alcantara, A.L., and Siskin, A. (2015). Sex trafficking of children in the United States: overview and issues for congress. Congressional Research Services. Retrieved from
- https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41878.pdf.
- Godsoe, C. (2015). Punishment as protection. Houston Law Review, 52(5), 1313-1384.
- Gouty, A. H. (2015). The best interests of a trafficked adolescent. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 22(2), 737-765.
- Harlan, E. K. (2012). It happens in the dark: examining current obstacles to identifying trafficking victims in india and the United States. University of Colorado Law Review, 83, 1113-1147.
- Hasselbarth, N. (2014). Emerging victimhood: moving towards the protection of domestic juveniles involved in prostitution. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy,21, 401-416.
- Heltonf, M. (2016). Human trafficking: how a joint taskforce between health care providers and law enforcement can assist with identifying victims and prosecuting traffickers. Health Matrix, 26(1), 433473.
- Kotrla, K. (2010). Domestic minor sex trafficking in the United States. Social Work, 55(2), 181-187.
